Today’s voice is Jared Massey’s from Utah.
I was merrily surfing around, catching up on the news when I came across a video that at first glance got me a bit confused. This video is about a man who was allegedly speeding and got pulled over, he asked to know how fast he was going and what the speed limit was since they (again, allegedly) had not passed a sign where the 40mph limit that the officer states was indicated. Now, the officer here seen does not respond to that and just keeps asking for license and registration, to which the man ultimately gives up and provides. The officer in question goes back to his cruiser to produce a ticket which the man refuses to sign, and at this point the officer gets him out of the car for “not complying with instructions”. Now, here’s the kicker: it’s not an african-american, a hispanic nor an asian… it’s your regular all-american blonde-haired Joe. After being thrown off for a moment, what happens next is the reason for this post.
Now, I may be wrong, but don’t you have a right to disagree whether to sign a speeding ticket or not? I believe that you can decide not to sign a speeding ticket and dispute it in court, since signing it would mean that you agree you were speeding. I’m not quite sure about that since I do not live in the states, so if someone has the correct information on the matter I’d be grateful to get a reply on that.
So our Joe (who you’ve inferred by now is Jared Massey, 28) got tasered by John Gardner, member of the Utah Highway Patrol. The reason provided by Gardner is that Massey failed to comply which is true to some degree: Massey did not comply at one point but an arrest for a situation that escalated because of the officer’s behavior is just downright wrong and an abuse of power which was used without the proper responsibility/wisdom in my opinion. You already saw the video, so let’s fast forward to the arrest. The officer arrests our Joe but does not read him his rights even when Massey demanded to have his rights provided which I believe is legally mandatory at the time of arrest, is it not? Now, almost at the end of the video, another officer’s voice is heard discussing the event and when officer Gardner briefed officer X, we hear officer X replying “Good for you” to Gardner. Wait… what?
Up to this moment I do not know if Gardner has been reprimanded or even studied for that matter. The course of action taken was not an appropriate one and should be analyzed since officers work for the people who sometimes step out of line, but even when they do there are different ways to get them back in and I hardly believe this was a right one (despite officer X’s approval); if officer Gardner had handled the situation with knowledge in hand, he could’ve easily gotten Massey to comply (of course, we’ll never know if Massey’s intention was honest to just know or if he would not have complied after knowing…). On the other hand, we don’t even know if officer Gardner really just pulled him over blind without a radar gun. A lot of ifs, but not enough if you ask me.
Take care and misbehave.
Source: Fark
